by Kenneth A. Fowler, Gerry M. Elfbaum, Karen A. Smith, and Thomas J. Nelligan
Measurement Principles |
Ultrasonic nondestructive testing (NDT)-characterizing material thickness, integrity, or other physical properties by means of high-frequency sound waves-has become a widely used technique for quality control. In thickness
gauging, ultrasonic techniques permit quick and reliable measurement of thickness without requiring access to both sides of a part. Accuracies as high as ±1 micron or ±0.0001 inch are achievable in some applications. Most
engineering materials can be measured ultrasonically, including metals, plastic, ceramics, composites, epoxies, and glass, as well as liquid levels and the thickness of certain biological specimens. Online or in-process
measurement of extruded plastics or rolled metal is often possible, as is measurement of single layers or coatings in multilayer materials. Modern hand held gauges are simple to use and highly reliable.
Precision ultrasonic thickness gauges usually operate at frequencies between 500 KHz and 100 MHZ, using piezoelectric transducers to generate bursts of sound waves when excited by electrical pulses. A wide variety of
transducers with various acoustic characteristics have been developed to meet the needs of industrial applications. Typically, lower frequencies will be used to optimize penetration when measuring thick, highly attenuating, or
highly scattering materials, while higher frequencies will be recommended to optimize resolution in thinner, non-attenuating, non-scattering materials. A pulse-echo ultrasonic thickness gauge determines the thickness of a part
or structure by accurately measuring the time required for a short ultrasonic pulse generated by a transducer to travel through the thickness of the material, reflect from the back or inside surface, and be returned to the
transducer. In most applications this time interval is only a few microseconds or less. The measured two-way transit time is divided by two to account for the down-and-back travel path, and then multiplied by the velocity of
sound in the test material. The result is expressed in the well-known relationship:
d=Vt/2
where d = the thickness of the test piece
V = the velocity of sound waves in the material
t = the measured round-trip transit time
Additionally, in actual practice, a zero offset is usually subtracted from the measured time interval to account for certain fixed electronic and mechanical delays. In the common case of measurements involving direct contact
transducers, the zero offset compensates for the transit time of the sound pulse through the transducer's wearplate and the couplant layer, as well as any electronic switching time or cable delays. This zero offset is set
as part of instrument calibration procedures and is necessary for highest accuracy and linearity.
|
Figure 1
Figure 1 represents a generalized block diagram of a modern microprocessor-controlled ultrasonic gauge. The pulser, under control of the microprocessor, provides a unidirectional broadband voltage impulse to a heavily damped
broadband ultrasonic transducer. The broadband ultrasonic pulse generated by the transducer is coupled into the test piece, normally with the aid of a liquid coupling medium. Returning echoes are received by the transducer and
converted back into electrical pulses, which in turn are fed to the receiver Automatic Gain Control (AGC) amplifier. The microprocessor-based control and timing logic circuits both synchronize the pulser and select the
appropriate echo signals to be used for time interval measurement.
If echoes are not detected during a given measurement period, the gauge will shut down to save power until a new measurement cycle is required. If echoes are detected, the timing circuit will precisely measure an interval
appropriate for the selected measurement mode, and then repeat this process a number of times to obtain a stable, averaged reading. The microprocessor then uses this time interval measurement, along with the sound velocity and
zero offset information stored in the Random Access Memory (RAM), to calculate thickness. This thickness measurement is then displayed on the Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) and updated at a selected rate. Many modern gauges
incorporate an internal datalogger and are capable of storing several thousand thickness measurements along with identification codes and setup information in RAM. These stored readings may be recalled to the gauge's
display or uploaded to a printer or computer for further analysis.
|
Measurement Modes and Transducer Selection
The methods of making ultrasonic measurements of thickness may be classified according to the type of transducer used to make the measurement, or they may be classified by the choice of echoes used to determine the ultrasonic
pulse transit time through the test piece. If we classify the measurement method by transducer type, we find three basic classifications used in precision thickness gauging:
1. Direct Contact transducers
2. Delay Line transducers
3. Immersion transducers
If we classify the measurement techniques by the choice of echoes used in making the transit time measurement, we find that there are again three basic classifications or modes:
Mode 1 - In Mode 1, measurement is made between an excitation pulse and the first backwall echo from the test piece, using direct contact-type transducers. It is a general purpose test mode and is normally
recommended for use unless one of the conditions described under Modes 2 or 3 is present.
Mode 2 - In Mode 2, measurement is made between an interface echo representing the near surface of the test piece and the first backwall echo, using delay line or immersion transducers. Mode 2 is most often
used for measurements on sharp concave or convex radiuses or in confined spaces with delay line or immersion transducers, for online measurement of moving material with immersion transducers, and for high-temperature
measurements with high-temperature delay line transducers.
Mode 3 - In Mode 3, measurement is made between two successive backwall echoes, using delay line or
immersion transducers. It may be employed only when clean multiple backwall echoes appear, which typically limits its use to materials of relatively low attenuation and high acoustic impedance such as fine-grained metals,
glass, and ceramics. Mode 3 typically offers the highest measurement accuracy and the best minimum thickness resolution in a given application, at the expense of penetration, and it is used when accuracy and/or resolution
requirements cannot be met in Mode 1 or 2.
These classifications are summarized in Figure 2, which gives a schematic representation of the three modes of timing and the types of transducers that can be employed for each.
Note: An additional common type of transducer is the dual element, which is normally used for corrosion survey applications rather than the precision gauging work that is the focus of this paper. As their name implies, dual
element transducers use a pair of separate piezoelectric elements, one for transmitting and one for receiving, bonded to separate delay lines. Thickness measurement is made in a modified Mode 1 method, reading to the first
backwall echo and subtracting a zero offset equal to the transit time through the delays. Dual element transducers are typically rugged and able to withstand exposure to high temperatures, and are highly sensitive to detection
of pitting or other localized thinning conditions. However, they are generally not recommended for precision gauging applications because of the possibility of zero drifting and timing errors due to V-path correction. Contact
us for further information on the use of dual element transducers.
|
Measurement
Ultrasonic thickness measurements utilizing direct contact transducers in Mode 1 are generally the simplest to implement and can be used in the majority of applications. For most materials the contact method of measurement
provides the highest coupling efficiency of ultrasound from the transducer into the test piece. Mode 1 contact measurements can generally be used when minimum material thickness does not fall below approximately 0.12 mm (0.005
inches) of plastic or 0.25 mm (0.010 inches) of metal, precision required is not better than 12.5 microns (0.0005 inch), test material is at or close to room temperature, and geometry permits contact coupling. Mode 2 and Mode 3
measurements with delay line and immersion transducers are, as noted above, generally recommended when application requirements preclude use of Mode 1.
- fig2.jpg
*Thickness range shown assumes a sound velocity of approximately 0.5 cm/µS or .23 in/µS and further assumes that maximum range is not limited by sound attenuation in the material.
The selection of the appropriate transducer for a given application is based on the range and resolution of the thickness measurement required, the acoustic properties of the test material(s), and part geometry. Often this is
best established by experimentation with test standards representing the desired range of measurement. In general, the highest frequency and smallest diameter transducers that will give acceptable results over the required
range would be recommended. Small diameter transducers are more easily coupled to the test material and permit the thinnest couplant layer at a given contact pressure. Furthermore, higher frequency transducers produce echo
signals of faster rise time and thereby enhance the precision of thickness measurements. On the other hand, the acoustic properties or surface condition of the test material may require large, low frequency transducers to
overcome poor coupling or signal losses due to scattering or attenuation. Selection of the optimum transducer in some cases will require compromising penetration for the sake of thin material resolution, or vice versa. In some
cases two or more transducers will be required to cover a required range of measurement in its entirety.
Factors Affecting Performance and Accuracy
Calibration. The accuracy of any ultrasonic measurement is only as good as the accuracy and care with which the gauge has been calibrated. All quality ultrasonic gauges provide a method for calibrating for the
sound velocity and zero offset appropriate for the application at hand. It is essential that this calibration be performed and periodically checked in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Sound velocity must
always be set with respect to the material being measured. Zero offset is usually related to the type of transducer, transducer cable length and mode of measurement being used.
Surface Roughness of the Test Piece. The best measurement accuracy is obtained when both the front and back surfaces of the test piece are smooth and parallel. If the contact surface is rough, the minimum
thickness that can be measured will be increased because of sound reverberating in the increased thickness of the couplant layer. There will also be potential inaccuracy caused by variations in the thickness of the couplant
layer beneath the transducer. Additionally, if either surface of the test piece is rough, the returning echo may be distorted due to the multiplicity of slightly different sound paths seen by the transducer, and measurement
inaccuracies will result.
Coupling Technique. In Mode 1 (direct contact transducer) measurements, the couplant layer thickness is part of the measurement and is compensated by a portion of the zero offset. If maximum accuracy is to be
achieved, the coupling technique must be consistent. This is accomplished by using a couplant of reasonably low viscosity, employing only enough couplant to achieve a reasonable reading, and applying the transducer with uniform
pressure. A little practice will show the degree of moderate to firm pressure that produces repeatable readings. In general, smaller diameter transducers require less coupling force to squeeze out the excess couplant than
larger diameter transducers.
In all modes, tilting the transducer will distort echoes and cause inaccurate readings, as noted below.
Curvature of the Test Piece. A related issue involves the alignment of the transducer with respect to the test piece. When measuring on curved surfaces, it is important that the transducer be placed
approximately on the centerline of the part and held as nearly normal to the surface as possible. In some cases a spring-loaded V-block holder may be helpful for maintaining this alignment. In general, as the radius of
curvature decreases, the size of the transducer should be reduced, and the more critical transducer alignment will become. For very small radiuses, an i mmersion approach will be necessary. In some cases it may be useful to
observe the waveform display via an oscilloscope or other waveform display as an aid in maintaining optimum alignment. Often practice with the aid of a waveform display will give the operator a proper infeel in for the best way
to hold the transducer. On curved surfaces it is important to use only enough couplant to obtain a reading. Excess couplant will form a fillet between the transducer and the test surface where sound will reverberate and
possibly create spurious signals that may trigger false readings.
Taper or Eccentricity. If the contact surface and back surface of the test piece are tapered or eccentric with respect to each other, the return echo will be distorted due to the variation in sound path across
the width of the beam. Accuracy of measurement will be reduced. In severe cases no measurement will be possible.
|
Acoustic Properties of the Test Material. There are several conditions found in certain engineering materials that can potentially limit the accuracy and range of ultrasonic thickness measurements:
1. Sound Scattering. In materials such as cast stainless steel, cast iron, fiberglass, and composites, sound energy will be scattered from individual crystallites in the casting or boundaries of dissimilar
materials within the fiberglass or composite. Porosity in any material can have the same effect. Gauge sensitivity must be adjusted to prevent detection of these spurious scatter echoes. This compensation can in turn limit the
ability to discriminate a valid return echo from the back side of the material, thereby restricting measurement range.
2. Sound Attenuation or Absorption. In many organic materials such as low density plastics and rubber, sound energy is attenuated very rapidly at the frequencies used for ultrasonic gauging. This attenuation
typically increases with temperature. The maximum thickness that can be measured in these materials will often be limited by attenuation.
3. Velocity Variations. An ultrasonic thickness measurement will be accurate only to the degree that material sound velocity is consistent with gauge calibration. Some materials exhibit significant variations
in sound velocity from point to point. This happens in certain cast metals due to the changes in grain structure that result from varied cooling rates, and the anisotropy of sound velocity with respect to grain structure.
Fiberglass can show localized velocity variations due to changes in resin/fiber ratio. Many plastics and rubbers show a rapid change in sound velocity with temperature, requiring that velocity calibration be performed at the
temperature where measurements are to be made.
Phase Reversal or Phase Distortion. The phase or polarity of a returning echo is determined by the relative acoustic impedances (density x velocity) of the boundary materials. Most commercial gauges assume the
customary situation where the test piece is backed by air or a liquid, both of which have lower acoustic impedances than metals, ceramics, or plastics. However, in some specialized cases (such as measurement of glass or plastic
liners over metal, or copper cladding over steel) this impedance relationship is reversed, and the echo appears phase reversed. To maintain accuracy in these cases it is necessary to change the appropriate Echo Detection
polarity, or on instruments where that is not possible, adjust the zero offset to compensate for a timing error equal to one-half cycle of the waveform.
A more complex situation can occur in anisotropic or inhomogeneous materials such as coarse-grain metal castings or certain composites, where material conditions result in the existence of multiple sound paths within the beam
area. In these cases phase distortion can create an echo that is neither cleanly positive nor negative. Careful experimentation with reference standards is necessary in these cases to determine effects on measurement accuracy.
If the effect is consistent it will usually be possible to compensate by means of a zero offset adjustment, but if echo shape is variable, highly accurate thickness measurements may not be possible.
|
Couplants
A wide variety of couplant materials may be used in ultrasonic gauging. We have found that propylene glycol is suitable for most applications. In difficult applications where maximum transfer of sound energy is required,
glycerin is recommended. However, on some metals glycerin can promote corrosion by means of water absorption and thus may be undesirable. Other suitable couplants for measurements at normal temperatures may include water,
various oils and greases, gels, and silicone fluids.
In some applications involving smooth surfaces, it is possible to substitute in place of liquid couplant a thin compliant membrane (such as a thin piece of polyurethane) between the face of the transducer or delay line and the
test piece. This approach will often require changes to gauge setup parameters and usually requires that the transducer be pressed firmly to the surface of the test piece. As noted below, measurements at elevated temperatures
will require specially formulated high temperature couplants.
High Temperature Measurements
Measurements at elevated temperatures (higher than approximately 50 degrees Celsius or 125 degrees Fahrenheit) represent a special category. First, it is important to note that standard direct contact transducers will be
damaged or destroyed by exposure to temperatures higher than this limit. This is due to the varying thermal expansion coefficients of the materials used to construct them, which will cause disbonding at elevated temperatures.
Direct contact transducers should never be used on a surface that is too hot to comfortably touch with bare fingers.
Thus, high temperature measurements should always be done in Mode 2 or Mode 3 with either a delay line transducer (with an appropriate high temperature delay line) or an immersion transducer. Sound velocity in all materials
changes with temperature, normally increasing as the material gets colder and decreasing as it gets hotter, with abrupt changes near the freezing or melting points. This effect is much greater in plastics and rubber than it is
in metals or ceramics. Velocity changes are related to changes in elastic modulus and density, and depending on the material and temperature range the relationship can be significantly non-linear. For maximum accuracy, the
gauge sound velocity setting should be calibrated at the same temperature where measurements will be made. Measurement of hot materials with a gauge set to room temperature sound velocity will often lead to significant error.
Finally, at temperatures greater than approximately 100 degrees C or 200 degrees F, special high temperature couplants are recommended. A variety of them are available from commercial sources.
Online Measurements
Continuous online ultrasonic thickness gauging can be performed on most engineering materials, providing a constant process monitor, and is particularly appropriate for extruded plastics and metal sheets and pipes. It is
usually done by coupling the sound energy into the test piece through a water column generated by a bubbler or squirter, or in a water bath. Measurement is normally performed in Mode 2 or 3, although in a few special cases
sliding direct contact transducers working in Mode 1 have been employed. For accurate online ultrasonic measurement, material temperature must be stable to avoid errors due to velocity variations. Surfaces must be smooth enough
to insure consistent coupling, and some type of fixturing is always required to maintain precise alignment between the transducer(s) and test piece.
Cable Length
Certain specialized applications such as underwater testing require a long cable between the transducer and ultrasonic gauge. While much of this work involves corrosion gauging and is therefore outside the scope of this paper,
some precision gauging applications require long cables as well. The length of cable that produces a significant effect on performance is application specific, depending on transducer frequency as well as accuracy and minimum
measurement range requirements. At 20 MHz, cable reflections will begin to affect waveform shape at lengths beyond about 1 meter or 3 feet. At lower frequencies, somewhat longer cables can be used without any special
considerations. However, performance with long cables should always be experimentally evaluated in light of specific application requirements, particularly when cable length exceeds approximately 3 meters/10 feet. In Mode 1
measurements, cable reflections can increase the length of the excitation pulse and limit minimum measurable thickness, and zero offset must be adjusted to compensate for the propagation time of electrical pulses through the
cable. In Modes 2 and 3, cable reflections can cause distortion of interface and backwall echoes, and in extreme cases (cables on the order of 30 meters/100 feet or greater) they can even result in large spurious signals
following desirable signals at an interval equal to the electrical transit time in the cable.
Further Notes on Modes of Measurement
Mode 1: Excitation Pulse To First Back Echo
Ultrasonic thickness measurements utilizing direct contact transducers are generally the simplest to implement and can be used in a wide variety of applications. For most engineering materials, the contact method provides the
highest efficiency in coupling ultrasound from the transducer to the test piece. It is advisable to utilize Mode 1 measurement with direct contact transducers whenever the requirements of the application permit.
As indicated in Figure 3 the contact mode of measurement can generally be used whenever the minimum thickness does not fall below approximately 0.5 mm/0.020 in in metals or 0.125 mm/0.005 in in plastics, and accuracy
requirements are not greater than 0.025 mm or ± 0.001 in. Also, as noted above, direct contact transducers should not be used if the test piece is hotter than approximately 50 degrees C or 125 degrees F. This is because of the
likelihood of thermal damage to the transducer at higher temperatures.
In this mode of measurement, the time interval between the excitation pulse and the first returned echo includes a small time increment representing pulse transit time through the transducer wearplate and the coupling fluid, as
well as cable delay and any offset due to rise time or frequency content of the detected echo. In order to compensate for these factors, gauges are provided with a zero offset function, which effectively subtracts from the
total measured time interval a period equivalent to the sum of these various fixed delays. Zero offset normally must be adjusted whenever the transducer frequency is changed. This may be done with the aid of a reference
standard of known thickness and sound velocity, or, if velocity is unknown, two standards of different known thicknesses which can be used to establish both velocity and zero.
Selection of the appropriate direct contact transducer is based on a number of considerations including the acoustic properties of the test material and the thickness and geometry of the test piece. In general, the most
reliable and repeatable results will be obtained with the highest frequency and smallest diameter transducer that will gave adequate performance over the thickness range to be measured. Small diameter transducers are more
easily coupled to the test piece and permit the thinnest couplant layer at a given coupling pressure. Furthermore, higher frequency transducers produce signals with faster rise times, thereby enhancing measurement accuracy. On
the other hand, the acoustic properties or surface condition of the test material may require that transducer frequency be lowered in order to overcome poor coupling and/or sound attenuation or scattering within the material.
In making contact thickness measurements on curved surfaces, the active element size of the transducer should normally be reduced as the radius of curvature is reduced. Further, the amount of couplant between the transducer and
the test surface should be minimized. Excessive couplant causes noise resulting from the reverberation of sound energy in the couplant fillet between the transducer and the curved surface.
Mode 2: Interface Echo to First Backwall Echo
Measurements between the first two echoes following the excitation pulse are categorized as Mode 2. Normally this involves measurement from an interface echo representing the boundary between a delay line or water path and the
outside surface of the test piece, to a backwall echo representing the inside surface.
There are several conditions that must be considered in making Mode 2 measurements, based on the fact that they require two valid echoes, interface and backwall. First, it is necessary to insure that an interface echo exists.
There are certain cases involving immersion measurements of low impedance materials such as soft plastics and silicones where the acoustic impedance of the test material is very similar to that of water. A similar situation can
occur when a delay line transducer is used on a material (typically a polymer) whose impedance nearly matches that of the delay line. In such cases the impedance match between the water or delay line and the test material may
reduce the interface echo to such low amplitude that it cannot reliably be detected. With delay line transducers the difficulty can usually be remedied by switching to a different delay line material. When the problem occurs in
immersion measurements, there may be no easy solution, since it is rarely possible to use liquids other than water as effective immersion couplants. (In the specialized case of an impedance match affecting hot extruded
plastics, it is usually possible to move the transducer farther down the cooling line to a point where the plastic has cooled somewhat and its acoustic impedance has increased.)
It is also necessary to monitor the phase or polarity of both interface and backwall echoes, and adjust instrument detection polarity and/or zero offset to compensate as necessary for inversions. The most common situation where
this applies is in delay line measurements involving both plastic and metal test materials. A plastic delay line coupled to a metal test piece represents a low-to-high impedance boundary, while the same delay line coupled to
many polymer materials can represent a high-to-low relationship of relative acoustic impedance. The interface echo polarity reverses between these two situations, and if the gauge is not properly adjusted a measurement error
will result. This can happen when a gauge with a delay line transducer is set up on metal reference blocks and then used to measure plastics. Interface and backwall echo phase distortions can also occur in immersion setups
involving radiused material, where complex interactions between beam shape and front and back surface curvature can significantly affect echo shape. In such applications it is essential to set up the instrument on reference
standards representing the actual material shape to be measured, so that the effects of any phase distortion can be compensated with zero offset.
|
Mode 3: Echo to Echo Following Interface
The Mode 3 measurement technique as defined here involves the measurement of a time interval between successive back echoes following an interface echo. This mode is normally reserved for situations where the test material is
relatively thin, and where the highest level of accuracy is required. Mode 3 measurement is best applied to engineering materials having an acoustic impedance greater than 1 x 10gm/cm2 sec (which includes most
metals, ceramics, and glass). In materials of this type, successive reverberations are all of the same polarity, and the relative amplitude of successive echoes is determined by the transmission coefficient of the sound energy
out of the material into either polystyrene or water. Since both of these materials are of relatively low acoustic impedance, the ratio of successive echo signal amplitudes is usually greater than 0.5, or -6dB. Table II shows
the fractional energy loss between successive echoes that can be expected for water and for polystyrene delays. If materials of widely different acoustic impedance are to be tested in this manner, compensation for the variation
in successive echo signal amplitudes must be provided in order to obtain the maximum accuracy for this mode. (This is done by means of a zero offset.) However it can be seen from Table II that errors do not become too great
until the acoustic impedance drops below 3 x 106.
For many industrial applications, use of a delay line transducer will be more convenient than i mmersion in Mode 3 measurements. Delay line transducers can be used to make measurements over a range from approximately 0.075
mm/0.003 in up to 12.5 mm/0.5 in, depending on frequency and delay line length. As with direct contact transducer measurements, the diameter or active element size of the delay line should be reduced as the radius of curvature
is reduced. For radiuses smaller than approximately 3 mm/0.125 in, i mmersion transducers will provide better coupling and are preferred.
If accurate thickness measurements are required on machined surfaces having a surface finish of approximately 3 microns RMS, Mode 3 measurements utilizing a delay line transducer will give more repeatable readings than a Mode 1
direct contact transducer. This is due to the fact that successive echo reverberations tend to subtract out the variable thickness of the couplant layer that adds to the time interval measured using a direct contact transducer.
The same general principle applies to painted surfaces, where multiple echoes will represent reverberations in the metal or other high-impedance material, not the paint. However, there are limitations on what sort of surfaces
will permit Mode 3 measurement, and in the case of severe roughness or corrosion this technique will not be applicable. At least two clean backwall echoes are required for a Mode 3 measurement, and as conditions get worse the
signal losses due to roughness will eventually obliterate the second echo.
When using immersion transducers for Mode 3 measurements, it is always necessary to monitor echoes with an oscilloscope during initial setup. Often spurious or unwanted signals will appear and, unless electronically blanked,
make accurate measurements impossible. Two possible situations are illustrated in Figure 4.
Figure 4a: Proper Measurement
Figure 4a shows a thickness measurement utilizing a focused transducer properly set up with the correct water path. The advantage of focused as opposed to unfocused i mmersion transducers of the same frequency and size is that
they often tolerate more beam angularization or misalignment, as well as improve coupling into radiused test pieces.
Figure 4b: Error - Measurement of Successive Lobes of
Single Echo
In Figure 4b the time interval measurement is being erroneously made between the first and second cycle of the first backwall echo. This condition can exist whenever echoes are ambiguously shaped, which can be due both to
misalignment and improper focusing.
Figure 4c: Error - Measurement of Mode Converted Shear Wave Echo
Figure 4c illustrates and erroneous time measurement between the first backwall echo and a mode converted shear echo which can result when a focused immersion transducer is used and the water path between the transducer and the
surface of the test piece is too long. In order to obtain clean multiple echoes for thickness measurement, a focused i mmersion transducer should be operated considerably short of the focal length. If it is operated at or near
the focal length, intermediate shear mode echoes will usually occur. (Note that this is a problem only in Mode 3 measurements; in Mode 2 nothing following the first backwall echo is of interest.) Similar effects can occur in
some cases where sharply radiused targets cause refraction and/or mode conversion of beam components arriving at other than normal incidence. In general, it is often advisable to experiment with different combinations of focus
and water path to determine what produces the cleanest multiple echoes in an given measurement application.
Appendix |
Energy and Corresponding Echo-Signal Amplitude Loss Per Pulse Reverberation in Class 3 Measurement Technique
| | |
E2/E1
|
A2/A1
|
E2/E1
|
A2/A1
|
E2/E1
|
A2/A1
| |
Tungsten
|
10
|
.89
|
.94
|
.97
|
.98
|
.94
|
.97
| |
Molybdenum
|
6.4
|
.83
|
.91
|
.95
|
.97
|
.97
|
.95
| |
Steel
|
4.6
|
.78
|
.88
|
.94
|
.97
|
.88
|
.94
| |
Copper
|
4.3
|
.76
|
.87
|
.93
|
.96
|
.86
|
.93
| |
Brass (70-30
|
3.7
|
.73
|
.85
|
.92
|
.96
|
.85
|
.92
| |
Zirconium
|
3.0
|
.67
|
.82
|
.90
|
.95
|
.81
|
.90
| |
Titanium
|
2.7
|
.64
|
.80
|
.86
|
.93
|
.74
|
.86
| |
Aluminum
|
1.7
|
.50
|
.71
|
.84
|
.92
|
.71
|
.84
| |
Fused Silica
|
1.5
|
.46
|
.68
|
.82
|
.91
|
.67
|
.82
| |
1.0
|
.30
|
.55
|
.74
|
.86
|
.55
|
.74
|
|
NDT Glossary
Accuracy: The agreement between the measured value and the true value of a parameter such as thickness. The true value may be defined with the aid of appropriate reference standards.
Acoustic Impedance: A material property defined as the product of sound velocity and the material's density.
Amplitude: In wave motion, the maximum displacement of material particles. In electronics, the magnitude of a signal, normally expressed as a positive or negative voltage.
Attenuation: The loss in acoustic energy which occurs between any two points in a sound path.
Backwall Echo: The echo received from the side of the test specimen opposite the side to which the transducer is coupled. The timing to this echo corresponds to the thickness of the specimen at that point.
Delay Line: A material (usually a polymer) placed in front of a transducer to create a time delay between the excitation pulse and the echo from the front surface of the test specimen.
Excitation Pulse: A brief electrical pulse applied to a piezoelectric element in an ultrasonic transducer, causing it to vibrate and generate sound waves.
Frequency: Mechanically, the number of cycles of vibration experienced by an oscillating body in a designated period of time (normally one second). Electrically, the rate at which a periodic signal (such as a
sine wave) repeats during a designated period of time.
Interface Echo: The echo reflected from the front surface of a test specimen, seen when using delay line or i mmersion transducers
Phase Reversal: An inversion (or change of algebraic sign) of the positive and negative peaks of a wave.
Resolution: In thickness gauging, the degree to which slightly different thicknesses or time intervals can be distinguished.
Sound Velocity: The speed at which a sound wave travels through a given material.
Sound Wave: A coherent pattern of mechanical vibrations in a solid, liquid, or gaseous medium.
Transducer: A device that transforms one form of energy into another. In ultrasonic testing this normally means converting electrical energy into mechanical energy or vice versa.
Waveform: A graphic presentation of energy levels in a wave train, plotted as amplitude versus time.
Zero Offset: A correction factor representing the difference between a measured time interval and the actual sound transit time in a test specimen, typically accounting for switching delays, cable delays, and
wearplate and couplant thickness
|
|
|